Skip to main content
Press Release

Location, Location, Location: Making the Decision to Stay or Go in Retirement

February 18, 2015

CFP Board’s Consumer Advocate Advises on the Financial Considerations of ‘Aging in Place’

With approximately 10,000 Baby Boomers – America’s largest generational group – transitioning to retirement each day, the pressures to plan for where they will spend their retirement years are significant. Soon-to-be retirees must ask themselves where they will be the most comfortable: remaining in their home, also known as “aging in place,” or moving to a dedicated retirement community.

CFP Board’s Consumer Advocate Eleanor Blayney, CFP
® outlines key considerations retirees should take into account when deciding on living arrangements in retirement.

“Americans overwhelmingly prefer to stay put in retirement, remaining in their homes,” says Blayney. “Some have no choice: costs of a dedicated retirement community may be out of reach. Others simply resist change, which is always difficult to navigate as we get older and set in our ways.”

In her latest contribution to LetsMakeaPlan.org, Blayney shares some important factors to consider when deciding whether to not to “age in place.”
 

  • Living arrangements: Married retirees or singles living at home with other family members are generally good prospects for aging in place. The primary issue here is safety. As we age, we lose physical acuity, including our vision, hearing, and balance. 

  • Suitability/adaptability of the home to physical needs: Open floor plans and one-level living are obvious wants and eventual needs for most retirees. As hale and hearty as you may be in your early retirement, you need to be realistic about your physical needs in the future. 
     
  • Services in community: How retiree-friendly is the community? Is it easy to get around by means other than driving? Are good medical providers and facilities easily accessible? Some communities with a high concentration of retirement-aged residents are designated as “NORCs” – or Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities – with special services for the aging-in-place retiree population.

Blayney also advises that when making the decision to “age in place,” financial costs must be carefully evaluated. Retirees determined to stay in their homes need to plan for how they will pay for needed services such as in-home caretaking. Some of the major options to ensure retirees can afford these expenses include:

  • Long-term care (LTC) insurance:  Most long-term care policies today provide coverage for in-home caretaking services. Unfortunately, a 2014 Genworth Financial study found that very few Americans have LTC insurance despite the high likelihood they will eventually need care.

  • Reverse mortgage:  Rent or mortgage payments, property taxes, and depreciation may make staying in the home while receiving LTC services more expensive than the annual costs of a nursing home or continuing care facility. Reverse mortgages have, fortunately, become a more mainstream financing option and less expensive. However, retirees should still be mindful of the pitfalls involved, such as possible loss of the home if the stipulations of the mortgage agreement are not met.

  • Medicaid:  A last-resort option that few retirees like to think about is Medicaid. Unlike Medicare or private health insurance, Medicaid does provide for caretaking services in the home, but only for those aging-in-placers who have exhausted most of their net worth. 

“While aging-in-place is the preferred option for most retirees, it isn’t necessarily the best option from a financial point of view,” says Blayney. “It requires taking a realistic and non-sentimental view of the potential costs that may be incurred in retirement, and comparing them to the costs of other less familiar and comfortable options. Advice from a CFP® professional is definitely called for.”