Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total
26612 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Borrowing from Client; Suitability; Bankruptcy
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 102; 607; 1.4; 501; 202; 6.5; 401(a); 103(d)
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 08/14/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he made a series of misrepresentations to financial planning clients related to a loan used to purchase bank stock on behalf of the clients.

27735 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Suitability; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Professionalism; Disclosure to Clients; Client's Best Interest; Customer Complaints
Standard(s) Violated: Article 202; 606(b); 201; 703; 607
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 05/14/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she: 1) recommended that a client, a risk-adverse retiree, invest $100,000 into The Fund, an investment that Respondent described as a partnership, but which was in actuality a hedge fund; 2) failed to disclose the conflict of interest that existed as a result of Respondent’s role as Advisor for The Fund; 3) recommended The Fund to Grievant although Respondent when the client may not have met the requirements to be an accredited investor; and 4) denied any remunerative connection to The Fund, despite her advisory role.

28679 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 607; 302; 701; 606(a); 201
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 08/08/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to have his wife file a tax return for the 2005 tax year and therefore did not report a possible gain based on the differential between the remaining debt on the promissory note and the adjusted tax basis of a property; 2) failed to generate records to sufficiently document his mother’s intentions as proof of the legitimacy a 2003 tax deferred exchange; 3) failed to seek a formal independent third-party review of the 1031 exchange; and 4) provided financial guidance and assistance to his mother in 2003 regarding Medicaid planning although he lacked the requisite knowledge regarding Medicaid and did not seek an independent third-party review of his plan.

28855 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Forgery; Professionalism; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 201; 606(b); 607; 5.1; 4.3; 4.6; 102; 4.4; 406
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 11/20/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she 1) altered client documents, which violated her firm’s policies and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.’s (“FINRA”) Rule 2010 and 2) created consolidated customer statements which were then provided to certain clients without firm pre-approval.

29005 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Fiduciary Duty; Suitability; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; 102; 1.4; 201; 5.1; 406; 606(b); 4.1; 4.4; 401(a); 606(a); 6.5; 2.2(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 11/20/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she sold “C” shares to her clients not because they were suitable, but as a method of ensuring that she was paid for her advisory services, and failed to: 1) enter into written advisory agreements with her “C” share advisory clients; 2) provide written disclosures required by Part 2 of Form ADV to her “C” share advisory clients; and 3) provide a complete description of the share class options and fees of mutual funds to her “C” share advisory clients and failed to: 1) ensure that salespersons were making suitable “C” share investment recommendations; 2) enforce the RIA Manual requirement of a written advisory agreement for clients using “C” shares as an advisory fee; and 3) enforce the requirement of delivery of the Disclosure Document. Respondent also failed to reasonably supervise her salespersons by failing to ensure that salespersons were making suitable “C” share investment recommendations. Respondent also failed to report her suspension by State from acting in any principal or supervisory capacity for twelve months to CFP Board within 30 calendar days, in violation of Article 13.2 of the Disciplinary Rules and Procedures (“Disciplinary Rules”).

28127 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Disclosure to CFP Board; Professional Discipline; Outside Business Activity
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 606(a); 406; 6.4; 606(b)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 01/05/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) recommended that a client invest approximately $100,000 in an oil and gas joint venture, outside the scope of Respondent’s relationship with his Firm, and which resulted in the termination of Respondent’s employment; and 2) failed to disclose to CFP Board that he signed a FINRA AWC wherein he consented to a $5,000 fine and suspension from association with any Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA,” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealers or “NASD”) member in any capacity for a period of six months due to his outside business activities.

Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total