Page 1 of 1 , 11 Items in Total
16726 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Disclosure to CFP Board; Misrepresentation; Professional Discipline; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 607; Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 11/30/2009
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) Made exaggerated statements and improper projections about clients’ accounts; 2) Prepared and/or used documents that had not been approved by a registered principal of Respondent’s firm; 3) Failed to retain records showing which sales materials were disseminated to customers; and 4) Failed to disclose a 2003 civil suit and a 2003 National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) arbitration on the Declaration Section of his Initial Application for CFP® Certification.

20393 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Disclosure to CFP Board; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 11/06/2008
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct by failing to disclose a National Association of Securities Dealers Arbitration on his Initial Certification Application.

21787 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Diligence; Disclosure to Clients; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation; Unauthorized Use of the Marks; Professional Discipline; Breach of Contract; Suitability; Commingling; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; C
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 704; Article 3(a); 201; Article 3(g); 103(d); 606(b); 606(a); 601; 701
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 02/27/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) did not fully inform his client (“Client”) as to the nature of an investment he made for her and did not provide risk disclosure documents to her; 2) did not inform the Client about a civil suit he initiated against the company that offered the product; 3) did not research the company that offered the product before the Client invested in it; 4) commingled his investment funds with the Client’s; 5) used the CFP® marks while not certified; and 6) violated federal and state securities regulations.

25999 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Customer Complaints; Suitability; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 1.4; 4.3; 4.5; 6.5; 4.4; 3.3
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 12/05/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he recommended that clients purchase a high-risk illiquid security without researching the financial condition of the firm proving financial support of the investment.

26476 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Arbitration; Suitability; Client's Best Interest; Fiduciary Duty
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 4.4; 202; 1.4; 4.5; 606(b); 201; 102; 607; 1.3; 703
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 05/08/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he concentrated clients’ assets in private placements.

27092 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Commission/Compensation; Advertising; Employer Policy Violation; Misuse of the Marks; Client's Best Interest; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; 2.1; 4.5; 6.1; Article 3(a); 6.5; 1.4; 4.3; 5.1; 4.4
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/09/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he 1) sold allegedly unsuitable insurance policies to his financial planning clients; 2) communicated to clients and prospective clients allegedly misleading information related to client testimonials, the registration status of his firm (“Respondent’s Firm”), and his compensation; 3) was terminated by Firm due to his use of client testimonials, failure to disclose outside business activities, and advertising violations; 4) violated State securities laws related to registration of his business entities, disclosure of outside business activities, client testimonials, and disclosure of his criminal charge to all regulatory bodies; 5) pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of Obtaining Contents of Communications; and 6) improperly used the CFP® marks in the Internet domain name www.respondentsnamecfp.com, the email addresses respondent@respondentsnamecfp.com and employee@respondentsnamecfp.com, and the Twitter handle @respondentsnameCFP and the corresponding Internet domain name https://twitter.com/#!/respondentsnamecfp.

29246 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fiduciary Duty; Misrepresentation; Commission/Compensation; Conflict of Interest; Professional Discipline; Suitability; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.5; 2.1; 2.2(a); 2.2(b); 4.3; 1.4; Article 3(d)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 10/01/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct by making material misstatements and omissions to their clients while recommending that the clients invest in what was found to be a Ponzi-like investment scheme.


29350 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Suitability; Client's Best Interest; Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 4.1; 6.5; 4.5; 4.6; 4.3; 4.4
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to disclose information related to the liquidity of, risks associated with, and the assets underlying an investment product; 2) failed to make and preserve books and records as required under the Exchange Act rules by having a record of basic identifying and financial information for the two clients involved in purchasing an investment; 3) allowed an unregistered employee to effect the purchase of an investment; and 4) failed to enforce his firm’s written supervisory procedures by failing to prepare new account forms and record basic identifying and financial information for the clients’ who purchased an investment.

29845 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Revocation of a Financial Professional License; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); Article 3(e); Article 3(d); Article 3(a); Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 04/25/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when: 1) the State Department of Taxation and Finance (“Department”) revoked her insurance license because she failed to pay employer withholding taxes, penalties and interest; 2) she failed to notify CFP Board within the required 30 calendar days that State revoked her insurance license; and 3) declared State 2 as her home state with respect to her non-resident insurance license even though she was not then licensed as an insurance producer in State 2.

30009 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; Article 3(a); 4.3; Article 3(d); Article 3(e); Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 10/17/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he : 1) failed to disclose to CFP Board on multiple occasions that was the subject of an investigation by the state and that he entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealer, Inc. or “NASD”); and 2) failed to properly supervise an individual’s sale of complex products and unsuitable Class A mutual fund shares.

30180 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(g); Article 3(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Summary: Respondent is the president and chief compliance officer of GFA, a State investment advisory firm. At all material times relevant to this Complaint, Respondent controlled GFA.

Page 1 of 1 , 11 Items in Total