Page 1 of 1 , 5 Items in Total
17262 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Diligence; Professionalism; Disclosure to CFP Board; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Supervision; Arbitration; Customer Complaints
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 606(a); 606(b); Article 3(a); Article 3(d); 607; Article 3(e); 201
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) allowed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) member firm (“Firm”), of which he was the Chief Compliance Officer, to participate in securities offerings during its suspension without satisfying the requirements of the suspension; 2) allowed a representative of the Firm (“Representative”) to act as a principal when the Representative had been suspended by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now known as FINRA) from acting in any principal capacity; 3) processed commissions from securities offerings through a non-member company; and 4) was subject to three FINRA arbitrations and one state securities division investigation.

25199 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Failure to Repay Loan to Firm; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Judgment Lien; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.4; Article 3(e); 606(b); 6.5; Article 3(d); Article 3(f); 607; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 07/22/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a Complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

30311 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 5.1; 4.3; Article 3(g); Article 3(d); Article 3(e)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he was terminated by his employer for altering client documents.

30210 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Professionalism; Fiduciary Duty; Client's Best Interest; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 4.4; 4.3; 2.1; 1.4
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; FINRA Regulatory Action; Regulatory Action; Professionalism; Professional Organization Disciplinary Action; Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 02/01/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) invested client resources into two hedge funds managed by the Respondent, when the sole investment of the funds was an Energy company with only one illiquid asset; (2) misrepresented the assets held by the hedge funds to investors; and (3) oversaw improper valuations of the hedge funds’ assets that were in violation of rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 

29793 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Outside Business Activity; Failure to Cooperate with Staff
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 6.1; 5.1; 4.4; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 07/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) charged 47 advisory clients a “one-time set up fee” when they opened their accounts, despite the fact that he had been informed by his supervisor that he could not charge such fees; (2) charged 32 clients for his services in preparing their tax returns and received payment directly from the clients; (3) received commissions for selling insurance products directly from outside insurance carriers; and (4) failed to contact his former firm to request information related to the an arbitration, thereby failing to fully cooperate with CFP Board’s investigation and obstructing CFP Board’s staff in the performance of their duty.  


Page 1 of 1 , 5 Items in Total