Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
11045 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Professional Discipline; Employer Policy Violation; Diligence; Court Order Violation; Fitness
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 606(b); 607; 606(a); 701; 201
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/26/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

17554 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fiduciary Duty; Settlement; Diligence; Misrepresentation; Breach of Contract; Negligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 701
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 08/18/2009
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he completed a client’s (“Client”) life insurance application inaccurately, resulting in the Client’s wife being denied benefits under the Client’s life insurance policy after the Client’s death.

19812 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Diligence; Settlement; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Negligence; Misrepresentation; Breach of Contract; Fiduciary Duty
Standard(s) Violated: Article 701
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 08/24/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when a state civil court found him liable for violation of a state Consumer Protection Act after the wife of a former client (“Client”) lost her claim for benefits due to an inaccurate answer on the Client’s life insurance application.

22601 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Negligence; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 201; 701; 606(b); 607
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 11/28/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional ("Respondent") violated CFP Board's Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) prepared complex legal instruments for a mentally impaired individual ("Client") he had never met; 2) did not conduct an assesment of the Client's mental capacity prior to having her execute the legal instruments; and 3) had the Client execute legal instruments she did not and could not fully comprehend.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total