Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
29845 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Revocation of a Financial Professional License; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); Article 3(e); Article 3(d); Article 3(a); Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 04/25/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when: 1) the State Department of Taxation and Finance (“Department”) revoked her insurance license because she failed to pay employer withholding taxes, penalties and interest; 2) she failed to notify CFP Board within the required 30 calendar days that State revoked her insurance license; and 3) declared State 2 as her home state with respect to her non-resident insurance license even though she was not then licensed as an insurance producer in State 2.

30009 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; Article 3(a); 4.3; Article 3(d); Article 3(e); Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 10/17/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he : 1) failed to disclose to CFP Board on multiple occasions that was the subject of an investigation by the state and that he entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealer, Inc. or “NASD”); and 2) failed to properly supervise an individual’s sale of complex products and unsuitable Class A mutual fund shares.

30180 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(g); Article 3(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Summary: Respondent is the president and chief compliance officer of GFA, a State investment advisory firm. At all material times relevant to this Complaint, Respondent controlled GFA.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total