Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
22986 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Interim Suspension; Professional Discipline; Outside Business Activity; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Disclosure to Clients; Employer Policy Violation; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Suitability; Disclosure to CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 612; Article 3(e); 607; Article 3(a); 201; 606(a); 401(a); Article 3(d); 102; 606(b)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 12/08/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she: 1) engaged in outside business activities without obtaining written approval from her employer; 2) did not notify CFP Board of her suspension; 3) recommended that her clients invest in promissory notes issued by her son’s company; and 4) did not disclose risks and other material and relevant information regarding the promissory notes to her clients.

24078 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Disclosure to CFP Board; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(b); 607; 102; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not report trust fees as income on his tax returns for the years 2002 to 2003 and was subsequently suspended from legal practice.

28139 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Disclosure to CFP Board; Diligence; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 201; 6.4; 606(a); 701; 607
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/02/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) signed and issued an audit opinion letter as a “CPA” in State 1, when Respondent was not licensed in the state as a CPA with the State 1 CPA Board; 2) stated that he had performed an audit of Company 1, when he did not; and 3) did not have any working papers or any other audit documentation to support the audit opinion he signed and issued on behalf of Company 1.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total