Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
22317 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fitness; Settlement; Professional Discipline; Misdemeanor; Customer Complaints; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(a); 607
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; Client Dissatisfaction; FINRA Arbitration; Civil Court
Decision Date: 03/23/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when: 1) multiple clients filed customer complaints and arbitrations against him; and 2) a state division of securities issued an order of intent to revoke his state securities license.

23777 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professionalism; Suitability; Fitness; Customer Complaints; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 201; 606(b); 607; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 08/11/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when his recommendation resulted in 70% of the clients’ assets being invested in annuities.

25775 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Customer Complaints; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 5.1; 6.5; Article 3(a); 704; 102; 201; 607; 4.4; 606(b); 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction; Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/10/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) stated an annual income figure for a client on that client’s account application which he knew to be inaccurate, causing his firm’s books and records to be inaccurate and in violation of NASD Rules 3110 and 2110; 2) recommended to a client that she purchase a variable universal life insurance policy with an annual premium of $10,000 when Respondent knew that the client was unemployed; and 3) was placed on heightened supervision by his firm for violation of the firm’s lending policy and for failure to comply with firm policies and procedures relating to following pre-approval restrictions by accepting a trade on a client’s account from an unauthorized third party; and 4) was terminated by his firm for violating firm policy regarding use of discretion and accepting a trade from an unauthorized party.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total