Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total
19834 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Professional Discipline; Diligence; Fraud Related to Professional Activity
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 606(b); 406; 102; Article 3(a); 201; 607; 701
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he obtained waivers of Contingent Deferred Sales Charges (“CDSCs”) for approximately 14 customers by claiming that these customers were disabled, when, in fact, they were not.

19875 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Diligence; Fitness; Professionalism; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misrepresentation; Professional Discipline; Advertising; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 102; 401(a); 402; 201; 606(a); Article 3(a); 606(b); 607; 101(b)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 07/22/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she knowingly offered securities despite inaccurate financial projections set forth in a private placement memorandum.

23777 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professionalism; Suitability; Fitness; Customer Complaints; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 201; 606(b); 607; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 08/11/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when his recommendation resulted in 70% of the clients’ assets being invested in annuities.

24019 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fitness; Professional Discipline; Employer Policy Violation; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 606(a); 607; 606(b); 6.5; 201; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to file the required documentation regarding brief remarks at a cocktail party (“Presentation”); and 2) failed to disclose to his firm and a state regulator that he conducted the Presentation.

24020 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Competency; Fitness; Professionalism; Professional Discipline; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); Article 3(a); 201; 302; 606(b); 609; 607
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she prepared a legal document without being authorized to practice law.

24467 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Professional Discipline; Employer Policy Violation; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Fitness; Forgery
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 406; Article 3(a); 102; 607; Article 3(e)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 08/11/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he recommended that the clients over-concentrate their assets in annuities.

28508 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Client's Best Interest; Supervision; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Professionalism; Suitability
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 407(a); 705; 401(a); 703; 202; 607
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 05/14/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) recommended the Biotech Company stock to Client without giving the client the prospectuses or PPMs for the penny stock investments: 2) sold the Biotech Company stock to Client without the knowledge or approval of Firm; 3) discouraged the Clients from selling the penny stocks, while he sold his own Biotech Company shares; 4) recommended to Client the loan to Biotech Company, a company in which he had a personal stake, without disclosing the inherent conflict of interest; and 5) personally reimbursed Client $30,000 as compensation for a loan recommendation he made to Client.

Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total