Page 1 of 1 , 18 Items in Total
30450 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Books and Records; Conflict of Interest; Disclosure to Clients; Client's Best Interest
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 4.4; 4.3; 2.2(b); 1.4; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to: (a) seek best execution for clients when investing them in share classes that charged 12b-1 fees despite the availability of corresponding share classes without the fees; (b) disclose in his firm’s Forms ADV and advisory agreements the conflicts of interest that existed regarding his recommendations to clients of mutual funds that contained 12b-1 fees; and (c) perform required annual compliance reviews.


23371 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Unauthorized Use of the Marks
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.1; Article 3(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 12/22/2009
Summary: Whether a registrant (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he used the CFP® certification marks while not certified.

25200 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Granted Petition
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Misrepresentation; Conflict of Interest; Loaning to Client; Disclosure to Clients; Securities Laws Violation; Competency; Commingling; Fiduciary Duty; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 402; 301; 606(b); Article 3(a); 607; 102; 606(a); 103(d); 302; 701; 403
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 03/25/2011
Summary: Whether an applicant for reinstatement of his CFP® certification (“Respondent”) demonstrated rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence that he complied with all disciplinary orders and provisions of the Disciplinary Rules and Procedures and is, once again, fit to use the CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, and certification marks.

26886 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Court Order Violation; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(b); 602; 102; 201; 607
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/20/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sent anonymous letters to former clients falsely identifying himself as a former Compliance Officer with a broker-dealer; 2) denied, under oath, any involvement in writing the anonymous letters during his deposition testimony, but later admitted that he answered falsely under oath and knew the answers were false when he provided the original testimony; and 3) violated the terms of a preliminary injunction prohibiting him from contacting former clients, resulting in a Contempt of Court Order, three-day jail term and $500 fine.

28263 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 05/09/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she represented on her firm website that there were no conflicts of interest associated with her commission-based advice.

30414 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Misdemeanor
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(c); Article-13.1; 6.5; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Criminal; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he was convicted of sexual assault for groping a houseguest. 


29190 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Granted Petition
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 607; 606(a); 406; 201
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/13/2015
Summary: Pursuant to Article 16.2 of CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules and Procedures, an individual who has received a suspension for a period of longer than one year must petition the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (the “Commission”) for reinstatement. At the hearing, a petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner has been rehabilitated, has complied with all applicable disciplinary orders and provisions of CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules, and that the petitioner is fit to use the CFP® marks.

29220 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.1; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 06/26/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he publicly represented his compensation method as “fee only” on the “Find” search tool while registered with a broker-dealer that earns commissions for selling securities and while he still receives commissions for securities and insurance products that he previously sold.

29221 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/29/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while registered as a registered representative with a broker-dealer and while receiving trailing commissions as a licensed insurance agent.

29230 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Fee-Only; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 6.5; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 06/26/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he publicly misrepresented his compensation method as “fee-only” to clients and prospective clients on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search tool because Respondent is entitled to receive commissions as a registered broker with a broker-dealer (“BD”) and received commissions.

29234 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/13/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while serving as a registered representative of a broker-dealer.

29235 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/24/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function, while registered as a registered representative and while receiving commissions from insurance sales.

29262 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29269 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 05/08/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29271 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.1; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct (“Standards”) when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while registered as a registered representative with Broker-Dealer, a related party of Respondent that receives, or is entitled to receive commissions, and while he is entitled to receive referral fees if he refers clients to other affiliated of his employer.

29275 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29287 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/31/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he, disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while receiving commissions from insurance sales.

29300 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct (“Standards”) when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while he: 1) was entitled to receive commissions as a registered representative and due to being licensed and appointed to sell insurance; and 2) he earned a salary and bonus that is affected by referrals he makes to related parties that receive non-fee compensation.

Page 1 of 1 , 18 Items in Total