Page 1 of 1 , 9 Items in Total
30450 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Books and Records; Conflict of Interest; Disclosure to Clients; Client's Best Interest
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 4.4; 4.3; 2.2(b); 1.4; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to: (a) seek best execution for clients when investing them in share classes that charged 12b-1 fees despite the availability of corresponding share classes without the fees; (b) disclose in his firm’s Forms ADV and advisory agreements the conflicts of interest that existed regarding his recommendations to clients of mutual funds that contained 12b-1 fees; and (c) perform required annual compliance reviews.


25200 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Granted Petition
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Misrepresentation; Conflict of Interest; Loaning to Client; Disclosure to Clients; Securities Laws Violation; Competency; Commingling; Fiduciary Duty; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 402; 301; 606(b); Article 3(a); 607; 102; 606(a); 103(d); 302; 701; 403
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 03/25/2011
Summary: Whether an applicant for reinstatement of his CFP® certification (“Respondent”) demonstrated rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence that he complied with all disciplinary orders and provisions of the Disciplinary Rules and Procedures and is, once again, fit to use the CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, and certification marks.

26886 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Court Order Violation; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(b); 602; 102; 201; 607
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/20/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sent anonymous letters to former clients falsely identifying himself as a former Compliance Officer with a broker-dealer; 2) denied, under oath, any involvement in writing the anonymous letters during his deposition testimony, but later admitted that he answered falsely under oath and knew the answers were false when he provided the original testimony; and 3) violated the terms of a preliminary injunction prohibiting him from contacting former clients, resulting in a Contempt of Court Order, three-day jail term and $500 fine.

29973 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Compensation; Books and Records
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; Article-4; Article 3(d); 5.1; Article-13.4; Article-13.1; 4.3; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; CFP Board
Decision Date: 02/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he shared commissions with two unregistered individuals and caused his firm’s books and records to be inaccurate. 


30648 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Client Neglect; Client's Best Interest; Embezzlement or Other Financial; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article 5.1; 4.4; 4.3; 3.2; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; CFP Board; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she 1) conducted securities-related business communications with a firm customer using an outside/personal email account, in violation of Firm’s compliance policies, which expressly stated that the use of an outside email system by a financial advisor to communicate with clients, prospects or other Firm associated persons regarding Firm business, or for any other Firm business purpose is prohibited; 2) forwarded account information for a securities customer to the same outside/personal email address, in violation of FINRA Rule 2010; and 3) failed to take prudent steps to protect the security of information and property, including the security of stored information, whether physically or electronically, that was within Respondent’s control when she conducted securities-related business communications with a firm customer using an outside/personal email account.


29763 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Customer Complaints; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 5.1; 4.3; 3.4; Article-13.4; Article-13.1; 1.4; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; Customer Complaint; FINRA Discipline; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) violated his firm’s policy by twice failing to report outside business activities and obtaining the firm’s approval to engage in such activities; and 2) failed to clearly identify the assets over which he was to exercise investment discretion and exercised discretion in the client’s accounts on approximately 10 occasions without written discretionary authorization from the client.


30358 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 4.3; 5.1
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; FINRA Discipline; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he altered an email from a third party, forwarded it to an emp1oyee at his firm, and misrepresented that the email was written by the third party, to complete a transfer of funds requested by his client. 

 


29190 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Granted Petition
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 607; 606(a); 406; 201
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/13/2015
Summary: Pursuant to Article 16.2 of CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules and Procedures, an individual who has received a suspension for a period of longer than one year must petition the Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (the “Commission”) for reinstatement. At the hearing, a petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner has been rehabilitated, has complied with all applicable disciplinary orders and provisions of CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules, and that the petitioner is fit to use the CFP® marks.

29852 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 5.1; 6.2
Matter Type(s): Other
Decision Date: 11/02/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he twice represented his compensation method as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search tool even though his RIA is a related party to a firm that sells insurance products to clients for commissions.

Page 1 of 1 , 9 Items in Total