Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total
12637 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Suitability; Fitness; Misuse of the Marks; Settlement; Arbitration; Customer Complaints; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 601; 607; 4.2; 606(a); 201
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 06/21/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she: 1) engaged in a pattern of recommending that clients invest their entire retirement savings in unsuitable variable annuities and sub-account allocations, as evidenced by four National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now known as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. or “FINRA”) arbitrations; and 2) when she used “cfp” after her name on her Web site.

15094 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Misuse of the Marks; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Arbitration; Customer Complaints; Disclosure to Clients; Suitability; Diligence; Professionalism; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 607; 601; 201; 704; 606(b); 701; 102
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 08/11/2008
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) recommended variable annuities to elderly clients; and 2) omitted the registered trademark symbol when referring to CFP® on his letterhead, certification salutations and documents.

22183 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Misuse of the Marks; Settlement; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 102; 601; 606(b); 607; Article 3(a); 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 12/03/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he lied to his employer about his use of prohibited solicitation materials, resulting in a Letter of Caution from the National Association of Securities Dealers.

22505 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Breach of Contract; Confidentiality; Forgery; Advertising; Misrepresentation; Disclosure to CFP Board; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(e); 607; 503; 406; 102; Article 3(a); 501; 606(b); 201
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 12/22/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) forged a client’s signature by cutting and pasting the signature from one document to another; 2) disclosed client information to third parties without authorization from the client; 3) mailed a solicitation in potential violation of a non-compete agreement between an employee and the employee’s former firm; 4) misrepresented to his partner that he had sought the advice of counsel prior to mailing the solicitation; and 5) received a 15-day professional suspension from a state regulator.

23730 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Diligence; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Fitness; Employer Policy Violation; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Professional Discipline; Confidentiality
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; Article 3(a); 607; 606(a); 102; 406; 606(b)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/29/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

27092 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Commission/Compensation; Advertising; Employer Policy Violation; Misuse of the Marks; Client's Best Interest; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; 2.1; 4.5; 6.1; Article 3(a); 6.5; 1.4; 4.3; 5.1; 4.4
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/09/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he 1) sold allegedly unsuitable insurance policies to his financial planning clients; 2) communicated to clients and prospective clients allegedly misleading information related to client testimonials, the registration status of his firm (“Respondent’s Firm”), and his compensation; 3) was terminated by Firm due to his use of client testimonials, failure to disclose outside business activities, and advertising violations; 4) violated State securities laws related to registration of his business entities, disclosure of outside business activities, client testimonials, and disclosure of his criminal charge to all regulatory bodies; 5) pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of Obtaining Contents of Communications; and 6) improperly used the CFP® marks in the Internet domain name www.respondentsnamecfp.com, the email addresses respondent@respondentsnamecfp.com and employee@respondentsnamecfp.com, and the Twitter handle @respondentsnameCFP and the corresponding Internet domain name https://twitter.com/#!/respondentsnamecfp.

29324 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Unfair-Business-Practices; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misappropriation; Professionalism; Employer Policy Violation; Confidentiality; Breach of Contract
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 6.5; 5.1; 4.3; 3.2; 3.1
Matter Type(s): Civil Suit; Civil Court; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 02/05/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) took client information from Respondent’s old firm without authorization from the firm or clients; (2) transferred client information to Respondent’s new firm for financial gain; (3) failed to treat client information with the level of confidentiality required by applicable law; and (4) failed to securely handle electronically stored information. 

Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total