Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
23068 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Diligence; Commingling; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Loaning to Client; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 606(b); 607; Article 3(e); 201; 406; Article 3(d); 102; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 03/26/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) made a loan to a client (“Client”) in violation of his employer’s written procedures and National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD” now know as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or “FINRA”) Conduct Rules; 2) did not disclose to his employer (“Firm”) that he made the loan to the Client, in violation of Firm policy; 3) did not disclose to his firm that he executed a Power of Attorney granted by the Client; 4) exercised the Power of Attorney in connection with the sale of Respondent’s real property to the Client; 5) established a joint bank account with the Client; 6) was suspended and fined by the FINRA; and 7) did not disclose his FINRA suspension to CFP Board within 10 days.

23323 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Diligence; Outside Business Activity; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Fitness; Professional Discipline; Commingling; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 103(d); 406; 606(a); 607; Article 3(d); 102; Article 3(e); Article 3(a); 201
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/19/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he engaged in unauthorized outside business activities resulting in a fine and a suspension of his securities, insurance, and investment advisor licenses for 30 days.

24809 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Failure to Notify CFP Board; Suitability; Diligence; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Borrowing from Client; Fitness; Settlement; Revocation of a Financial Professional License; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 202; Article 3(e); 406; 606(a); 607; 606(b); 701; 201; 102; 401(a); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 04/26/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) offered and sold unregistered securities to clients in violation of sections of the State Securities Act; 2) failed to inform clients that the foreign currency exchange (“FOREX”) trading program investments were securities that were not registered with any state or federal regulatory authority; 3) participated in private securities transactions for compensation without providing written notice to and receiving written authorization from the Firm, in violation of its written procedures and National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now known as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. or “FINRA”) Conduct Rules 3040 and 2110; 4) borrowed $200,000 from a client in violation of the Firm’s written procedures and NASD Conduct Rules 2370 and 2110; 5) sold a product that the Firm did not have a selling agreement with, in violation of its written procedures; and 6) failed to provide requested information to FINRA in violation of NASD Rule 8210 and NASD Conduct Rule 2110.

29246 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fiduciary Duty; Misrepresentation; Commission/Compensation; Conflict of Interest; Professional Discipline; Suitability; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.5; 2.1; 2.2(a); 2.2(b); 4.3; 1.4; Article 3(d)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 10/01/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct by making material misstatements and omissions to their clients while recommending that the clients invest in what was found to be a Ponzi-like investment scheme.


Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total