Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total
21787 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Diligence; Disclosure to Clients; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation; Unauthorized Use of the Marks; Professional Discipline; Breach of Contract; Suitability; Commingling; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; C
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 704; Article 3(a); 201; Article 3(g); 103(d); 606(b); 606(a); 601; 701
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 02/27/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) did not fully inform his client (“Client”) as to the nature of an investment he made for her and did not provide risk disclosure documents to her; 2) did not inform the Client about a civil suit he initiated against the company that offered the product; 3) did not research the company that offered the product before the Client invested in it; 4) commingled his investment funds with the Client’s; 5) used the CFP® marks while not certified; and 6) violated federal and state securities regulations.

22183 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Misuse of the Marks; Settlement; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 102; 601; 606(b); 607; Article 3(a); 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 12/03/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he lied to his employer about his use of prohibited solicitation materials, resulting in a Letter of Caution from the National Association of Securities Dealers.

22513 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Diligence; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Fitness; Bankruptcy; Client's Best Interest; Disclosure to CFP Board; Commingling; Borrowing from Client; Fraud Related to Professional Activity
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 102; 409; Article 3(a); 607; 201; 704; 103(d)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/26/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a Complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

23068 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Diligence; Commingling; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Loaning to Client; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 606(b); 607; Article 3(e); 201; 406; Article 3(d); 102; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 03/26/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) made a loan to a client (“Client”) in violation of his employer’s written procedures and National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD” now know as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or “FINRA”) Conduct Rules; 2) did not disclose to his employer (“Firm”) that he made the loan to the Client, in violation of Firm policy; 3) did not disclose to his firm that he executed a Power of Attorney granted by the Client; 4) exercised the Power of Attorney in connection with the sale of Respondent’s real property to the Client; 5) established a joint bank account with the Client; 6) was suspended and fined by the FINRA; and 7) did not disclose his FINRA suspension to CFP Board within 10 days.

23323 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Diligence; Outside Business Activity; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Fitness; Professional Discipline; Commingling; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 103(d); 406; 606(a); 607; Article 3(d); 102; Article 3(e); Article 3(a); 201
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/19/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he engaged in unauthorized outside business activities resulting in a fine and a suspension of his securities, insurance, and investment advisor licenses for 30 days.

25775 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Customer Complaints; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 5.1; 6.5; Article 3(a); 704; 102; 201; 607; 4.4; 606(b); 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction; Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/10/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) stated an annual income figure for a client on that client’s account application which he knew to be inaccurate, causing his firm’s books and records to be inaccurate and in violation of NASD Rules 3110 and 2110; 2) recommended to a client that she purchase a variable universal life insurance policy with an annual premium of $10,000 when Respondent knew that the client was unemployed; and 3) was placed on heightened supervision by his firm for violation of the firm’s lending policy and for failure to comply with firm policies and procedures relating to following pre-approval restrictions by accepting a trade on a client’s account from an unauthorized third party; and 4) was terminated by his firm for violating firm policy regarding use of discretion and accepting a trade from an unauthorized party.

27321 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Suitability
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; Article 3(e); Article 3(a); 606(a); 701; 102; 401(a); 607; Article 3(d); 606(b)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/03/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional ("Respondent") violated CFP Board's Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to disclose that he was selling unregistered securities, in violation of State law; 2) failed to disclose that he would be compensated for the sale of securities, in violation of State law; 3) sold unregistered, nonexempt securities to 13 clients, in violation of State law; 4) sold an unsuitable promissory note to his client; and 5) failed to adhere to the principles of good business practice when he failed to execute his client's sell orders in a timely manner.

Page 1 of 1 , 7 Items in Total