Page 1 of 1 , 9 Items in Total
22855 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Supervision; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 406; 606(b); 606(a); 6.5; 705
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction; Professionalism
Decision Date: 11/28/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional ("Respondent") violated CFP Board's Standards of Professional Conduct when she 1) failed to adequately supervise Subordinate's professional services; 2) made a guest appearance on a television show and authored a newsletter column ("Media Appearances") without prior approval by her Firm: 3) violated National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD", now know as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or "FINRA") Conduct Rule 2210(b)(1) because she failed to obtain prior approval from her registered principal before making Media Appearances; and 4) defaulted on her credit card payment obligations.

23408 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Continuing Education Violation; Fitness; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(e); Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 406; 606(a); 606(b); 607; 201; 102
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 04/29/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he allowed a trainee to complete portions of his required CFP Board continuing education credits.

26286 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Outside Business Activity; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Employer Policy Violation; Supervision; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 607; 201; 606(b); 102; 408
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 02/14/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional ("Respondent") violated CFP Board's Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) falsely denied that he acted in a fiduciary capacity for firm customers and had a financial interest in any customer accounts on his firm's compliance questionnaies on seven occasions; and 2) entered into a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA," formerly know as the National Association of Securities Dealers or "NASD") in which he consented to the entry of findings that he violated NASD Conduct Rule 2110, a one-year suspension from association with any FINRA member in any capacity, and a $10,000 fine.

26933 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Continuing Education Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 606(a); 606(b); 102
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 03/08/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he received a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA” previously known as National Association of Securities Dealers “NASD”) suspension and $5,000 fine for using an answer key to complete a Long-Term Care (“LTC”) Continuing Education (“CE”) examination.

27227 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fitness; Employer Policy Violation; Supervision; Forgery; Bankruptcy
Standard(s) Violated: Article 5.1; 6.5; 4.3; Article 3(a); 4.1; 4.4
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 07/20/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conductwhen he: 1) filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy in 2010; 2) allowed clients to sign incomplete documents; and 3) allowed an assistant to add information to documents after clients had signed the document.

28190 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Continuing Education Violation; Disclosure to CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 102; 606(a); 201; 606(b); 607
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 03/29/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) allowed an individual to sign roster sheets indicating that he had attended insurance CE class sessions taught by Respondent, when the individual had not; and 2) provided the same individual with State Insurance Department course completion certificates for courses the individual had not completed.

28523 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Negligence; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Employer Policy Violation; Supervision
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.4; 4.6; 5.1; 6.5; 3.2
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 05/11/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sent unencrypted email correspondence containing confidential client information; 2) placed four trades and facilitated two wire transfers in a client’s account without discretion; and 3) directed his assistant to aid in the execution of four trades and two wire transfers in a client’s account without discretion.

31119 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Continuing Education Violation; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 6.2; Article 3(g); 6.5
Matter Type(s): Case Developed By Staff
Decision Date: 10/01/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he falsely self-reported to CFP Board that he had completed more than 30 Continuing Education (“CE”) courses providing approximately 80 hours of credits during three CE reporting. 


29328 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Failure to Register; Supervision; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; 6.5; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) allowed an employee to act as an investment adviser representative without registration as an investment adviser representative; 2) failed to ensure that Firm’s annual updating amendments to the Form ADV were filed timely; 3) failed to ensure that Firm provided accurate account statements; 4) failed to amend his Form U4 timely to reflect the change of his residential address; 5) failed to ensure that Firm’s owners were properly disclosed on Form ADV; 6) failed to supervise Firm and his designee, JE, by virtue of his failure to ensure that the firm’s requisite annual reviews were conducted annually (i.e., 2011 and 2012), and when they were conducted (i.e., 2009 and 2010), they were reasonably designed to detect the numerous failures cited by SSC; and 7) entered into the Order with the SSC regarding violations of state securities laws and regulations.

Page 1 of 1 , 9 Items in Total