Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
23714 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Advertising; Professional Discipline; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 606(b); 2.1; 6.5; 609; 201; Article 3(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) prepared a financial review without holding a valid Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) license, as required by state law; 2) communicated misleading information directly related to his professional qualifications and services when he advertised himself as a CPA despite not being licensed in the state in which he practiced; and 3) violated an agreement with the state requiring him to not represent himself as a public accountant and/or engage in the practice of accounting until he received a valid CPA license in the state.

24272 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Diligence; Misrepresentation; Fitness; Record-Keeping; Professional Discipline; Revocation of Other Professional License; Settlement
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); Article 3(e); 102; Article 3(d); 201; Article 3(a); 607; 701; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 03/25/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he she improperly notarized a power of attorney and had her notary license revoked as a result.

30764 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Custody-of-Client-Funds; Failure-to-Supervise; Record-Keeping; Books and Records
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; Article 3(d); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 02/01/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to maintain proper books and records, failed to provide proper custody of client funds, and failed to verify the credentials of a colleague that were posted on Respondent’s business website. 
 

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total