Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
17604 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Professionalism; Advertising; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Settlement; Failure to Register
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 201; 102; Article 3(f); 401(b); 606(a); 101(a); 401(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/08/2008
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a Settlement Offer issued to him by CFP Board.

21365 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Supervision; Record-Keeping; Advertising; Misrepresentation; Continuing Education Violation; Diligence; Disclosure to Clients; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 401(b); 101(a); 705; 701; 401(a); 606(a); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/11/2008
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority investigation showed that he and his company violated securities laws related to the sale of securities on military bases.

28855 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Forgery; Professionalism; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 201; 606(b); 607; 5.1; 4.3; 4.6; 102; 4.4; 406
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 11/20/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she 1) altered client documents, which violated her firm’s policies and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.’s (“FINRA”) Rule 2010 and 2) created consolidated customer statements which were then provided to certain clients without firm pre-approval.

29328 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Failure to Register; Supervision; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; 6.5; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) allowed an employee to act as an investment adviser representative without registration as an investment adviser representative; 2) failed to ensure that Firm’s annual updating amendments to the Form ADV were filed timely; 3) failed to ensure that Firm provided accurate account statements; 4) failed to amend his Form U4 timely to reflect the change of his residential address; 5) failed to ensure that Firm’s owners were properly disclosed on Form ADV; 6) failed to supervise Firm and his designee, JE, by virtue of his failure to ensure that the firm’s requisite annual reviews were conducted annually (i.e., 2011 and 2012), and when they were conducted (i.e., 2009 and 2010), they were reasonably designed to detect the numerous failures cited by SSC; and 7) entered into the Order with the SSC regarding violations of state securities laws and regulations.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total