Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
29661 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Bankruptcy; Borrowing from Client
Standard(s) Violated: Article 1.4; 6.5; 3.6; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 04/25/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he entered into a loan with a client that he subsequently discharged in bankruptcy.

29800 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Disclosure to CFP Board; Professional Discipline; Bankruptcy; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 5.1; 4.3; 6.2; 6.5
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 10/30/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) from January 2010 through December 2010, held himself out to the public, and practiced as a CPA when he was not currently licensed; and b) failed to timely amend his Form U4 to disclose a personal bankruptcy filing.

30008 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Bankruptcy; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(e); Article 3(a); 6.5; Article 3(d)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 03/02/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose his 2010 Chapter 7 bankruptcy until 2013, in violation of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Rules 1122 and 2010.

30033 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Disclosure to Clients; Fee-Only; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 4.3; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 07/21/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) communicated, directly or indirectly, to clients or prospective clients misleading information directly or indirectly related to the certificant’s professional qualifications or services when he misrepresented his compensation structure as “fee-only” despite receiving commissions; 2) failed to disclose to prospective clients or clients an accurate and understandable description of the compensation arrangements being offered; 3) failed to separately invoice clients each time he withdrew his fee from the client’s account causing him to violate net-capital requirements; and 4) entered into, extended, or renewed investment advisory contracts which failed to disclose accurate advisory fees.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total