Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
21048 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Felony-Theft; Embezzlement or Other Financial; Securities Laws Violation; Competency; Fitness; Misrepresentation; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Interim Suspension
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 607; Article 3(c); 606(b); 606(a); 102; 406; 302; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/10/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sold securities to clients while not licensed to do so; 2) promised investors large returns and guaranteed their principal on fraudulent investments; and 3) pleaded guilty to a felony investment fraud charge.

21702 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Judgment Lien; Fraud-Other; Misrepresentation; Court Order Violation; Disclosure to CFP Board; Other Ethics; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 607; Article 3(f); 102; 606(b); 201; 602; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 02/26/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) was found to have engaged in a fraudulent transfer of real property; 2) was sanctioned for intentional spoliation of data from his computers in violation of a court protective order; and 3) did not pay enrollment fees for a continuing education course he attended, and did not provide proof of payment upon CFP Board’s request.

24265 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Client's Best Interest; Negligence; Suitability; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 704; 201; 606(b); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 11/28/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional ("Respondent") violated CFP Board's Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) recommended that the client ("Client") replace her existing mutual funds with a variable annuity, thereby incurring additional fees and charges; 2) failed to research alternative options that would have been more beneficial to Client; and 3) placed over 75% of Client's investment assets in a long-term variable annuity with limited liquidity.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total