Page 1 of 1 , 2 Items in Total
30648 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Client Neglect; Client's Best Interest; Embezzlement or Other Financial; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article 5.1; 4.4; 4.3; 3.2; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; CFP Board; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she 1) conducted securities-related business communications with a firm customer using an outside/personal email account, in violation of Firm’s compliance policies, which expressly stated that the use of an outside email system by a financial advisor to communicate with clients, prospects or other Firm associated persons regarding Firm business, or for any other Firm business purpose is prohibited; 2) forwarded account information for a securities customer to the same outside/personal email address, in violation of FINRA Rule 2010; and 3) failed to take prudent steps to protect the security of information and property, including the security of stored information, whether physically or electronically, that was within Respondent’s control when she conducted securities-related business communications with a firm customer using an outside/personal email account.


30664 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Private-Securities-Transaction; Competency; Professional Discipline; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 5.1; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Professional Organization Disciplinary Action; Regulatory Action; FINRA Regulatory Action; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Arbitration; Complaint to CFP Board
Decision Date: 02/01/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) engaged in private securities transactions without informing his employer, in writing, in violation of NASD and FINRA rules; (2) invested his money, and the money of a work colleague, into a mortgage-lending fraud; (3) was the subject of a FINRA investigation and regulatory suspension; and (4) was the subject of a state DFS regulatory fine

Page 1 of 1 , 2 Items in Total