Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
17262 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Diligence; Professionalism; Disclosure to CFP Board; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Supervision; Arbitration; Customer Complaints
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 606(a); 606(b); Article 3(a); Article 3(d); 607; Article 3(e); 201
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) allowed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) member firm (“Firm”), of which he was the Chief Compliance Officer, to participate in securities offerings during its suspension without satisfying the requirements of the suspension; 2) allowed a representative of the Firm (“Representative”) to act as a principal when the Representative had been suspended by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now known as FINRA) from acting in any principal capacity; 3) processed commissions from securities offerings through a non-member company; and 4) was subject to three FINRA arbitrations and one state securities division investigation.

25199 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Failure to Repay Loan to Firm; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Judgment Lien; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.4; Article 3(e); 606(b); 6.5; Article 3(d); Article 3(f); 607; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 07/22/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a Complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

28945 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 4.3; 4.4; 6.2; 6.5
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 10/30/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) engaged in investment advisory business in State without proper registration, resulting in a Consent Order from the State Securities Division; and 2) failed to disclose the Consent Order with State on his 2009, 2012 and 2014 CFP® certification Renewal Applications.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total