Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
25199 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Failure to Repay Loan to Firm; Failure to Notify CFP Board; Judgment Lien; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.4; Article 3(e); 606(b); 6.5; Article 3(d); Article 3(f); 607; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 07/22/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not respond to a Complaint issued to him by CFP Board.

27037 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Forgery; Suitability; Securities Laws Violation; Employer Policy Violation; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 202; 6.5; 405; 607; 606(b); 201; 701; 406
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 09/13/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sold 20,000 stock put options in SH and YH’s account, resulting in a total unrealized loss of $430,000 and a realized loss of almost $2 million; 2) charged SH and YH full commissions on their trades when they should have been entitled to discounted rates based on the size of their investment accounts; 3) charged SH and YH an exorbitant fee of 8% a year; 4) altered the clients’ new account forms with White-out, causing Firm to retain and preserve altered records and causing him to be suspended by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) for violation of firm policy and National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110; and 5) failed to report his FINRA suspension within 30 days.

28945 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 4.3; 4.4; 6.2; 6.5
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 10/30/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) engaged in investment advisory business in State without proper registration, resulting in a Consent Order from the State Securities Division; and 2) failed to disclose the Consent Order with State on his 2009, 2012 and 2014 CFP® certification Renewal Applications.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total