Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total
21744 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Professionalism; Client's Best Interest; Forgery; Misrepresentation; Professional Discipline; Unauthorized Transaction; Employer Policy Violation; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Settlement
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 201; 406; 102; 103(c); 607; 202; 606(b)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 12/19/2008
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he signed clients’ signatures on documents without their authorization.

21787 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Diligence; Disclosure to Clients; Securities Laws Violation; Misrepresentation; Unauthorized Use of the Marks; Professional Discipline; Breach of Contract; Suitability; Commingling; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; C
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 704; Article 3(a); 201; Article 3(g); 103(d); 606(b); 606(a); 601; 701
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 02/27/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) did not fully inform his client (“Client”) as to the nature of an investment he made for her and did not provide risk disclosure documents to her; 2) did not inform the Client about a civil suit he initiated against the company that offered the product; 3) did not research the company that offered the product before the Client invested in it; 4) commingled his investment funds with the Client’s; 5) used the CFP® marks while not certified; and 6) violated federal and state securities regulations.

22166 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Denied But Allow Reapplication
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Employer Policy Violation; Diligence; Forgery; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Professionalism
Standard(s) Violated: Article 701; 201; 607; 606(b); 406; 102; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 11/06/2008
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) signed clients’ names on documents that the clients did not authorize Respondent to sign; and 2) violated the corporate policy of his broker-dealer in doing so.

22961 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Fitness; Forgery
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 406; 607; 201; Article 3(a); 102
Matter Type(s): Professionalism; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/23/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he signed his clients’ initials to account-related documents and represented to his employer that the initials were made by the clients.

24651 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Forgery; Professional Discipline; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 406; 606(b); 102; 607; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 08/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he affixed multiple client signatures on documents and purchased financial plans for two clients with his own funds in violation of firm policy, National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or “FINRA”) Conduct Rule 2110, and a state insurance code provision.

28392 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation by DEC
Keyword(s): Customer Complaints; Settlement; Forgery; Misappropriation; Unauthorized Transaction
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.4; 3.5; 4.1; 1.4; 3.4; 6.5; 3.8
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 11/08/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he forged his clients’ signatures in letters to a bank in order to misappropriated his clients’ assets for his own personal use by transferring the clients’ assets to his personal account.

Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total