Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total
30419 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Books and Records; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article-13.4; Article-13.1; Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 4.6; 4.3
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; FINRA Discipline; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to reasonably supervise his assistant, who had primary responsibility for preparing and processing applications and other account paperwork for customers.  Respondent’s assistant (a) altered documents relating to customer accounts, including by reusing signatures from forms that previously had been completed by customers, (b) caused the falsified forms to be maintained in the customers’ files, and (c) falsified documents to expedite transactions as an accommodation to customers (the firm’s compliance manual prohibited altering documents in the manners employed). 


16145 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Customer Complaints; Suitability; Settlement; Diligence; Record-Keeping; Fitness; Disclosure to Clients; Client's Best Interest; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Negligence; Competency
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 201; 401(a); Article 3(a); 405; 402; 606(b); 607; 102
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/26/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) treated a client’s payments as nontaxable gifts rather than taxable income; 2) did not disclose the income on his 2000 and 2001 state and federal tax returns; 3) did not disclose to a client the potential for a conflict of interest in serving as the appointed trustee of a trust and as an investment adviser for the trust; 4) double and triple charged clients for services; and 5) failed to disclose commissions.

22961 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Fitness; Forgery
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 406; 607; 201; Article 3(a); 102
Matter Type(s): Professionalism; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/23/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he signed his clients’ initials to account-related documents and represented to his employer that the initials were made by the clients.

23337 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Other Ethics; Fitness; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 101(b); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 01/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he used copyrighted materials without permission or attribution.

24651 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Forgery; Professional Discipline; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 406; 606(b); 102; 607; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 08/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he affixed multiple client signatures on documents and purchased financial plans for two clients with his own funds in violation of firm policy, National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or “FINRA”) Conduct Rule 2110, and a state insurance code provision.

26886 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Court Order Violation; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(b); 602; 102; 201; 607
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/20/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sent anonymous letters to former clients falsely identifying himself as a former Compliance Officer with a broker-dealer; 2) denied, under oath, any involvement in writing the anonymous letters during his deposition testimony, but later admitted that he answered falsely under oath and knew the answers were false when he provided the original testimony; and 3) violated the terms of a preliminary injunction prohibiting him from contacting former clients, resulting in a Contempt of Court Order, three-day jail term and $500 fine.

Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total