Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
30507 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Delay---Petition; Petition-for-Consideration---Denied
Keyword(s): Petition-for-Consideration; Unauthorized-use-of-CFP-Marks; Fraud-Other; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Fitness-Standards
Matter Type(s): Unauthorized-use-of-CFP-Marks; Civil Suit; Customer-Complaints
Decision Date: 06/12/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® applicant (“Respondent”) failed to meet CFP Board’s Fitness Standards when: (1) She misrepresented the cost of various insurance policies, and engaged in misleading sales tactics to convince clients to purchase insurance plans; and (2) her firm used CFP® marks on the Respondent’s firm profile page before Respondent was certified.


29324 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Unfair-Business-Practices; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misappropriation; Professionalism; Employer Policy Violation; Confidentiality; Breach of Contract
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 6.5; 5.1; 4.3; 3.2; 3.1
Matter Type(s): Civil Suit; Civil Court; FINRA Discipline; FINRA Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 02/05/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) took client information from Respondent’s old firm without authorization from the firm or clients; (2) transferred client information to Respondent’s new firm for financial gain; (3) failed to treat client information with the level of confidentiality required by applicable law; and (4) failed to securely handle electronically stored information. 

30845 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Failure to Notify CFP Board; Settlement; Unfair-Business-Practices; Misappropriation; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Confidentiality
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(g); Article 3(a); 6.5
Matter Type(s): Failure to Disclose to CFP Board; Civil Suit; Civil Court
Decision Date: 02/01/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) sought and obtained confidential client information from another firm; (2) accepted an unredacted, 52-page billing report that a colleague had printed from secure networks at another firm; (3) was found responsible by a state court for the commission of (a) misappropriating trade secrets and (b) unfair business practices; and (4) failed to disclose such to CFP Board.  
 

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total