Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
16502 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Fraud-Other; Unauthorized Transaction; Disclosure to Clients; Professionalism; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 406; 606(a); Article 3(a); 102; 704; 606(b); 607; 201; 701
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 11/10/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he sold promissory notes without receiving prior approval from his firm, resulting in: 1) a National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) bar; 2) two terminations; and 3) two civil suits being filed against him.

20420 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Suitability; Churning; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Professional Discipline; Unauthorized Transaction; Diligence; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 701; 703; 201
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; Professionalism; FINRA Arbitration; Civil Court
Decision Date: 03/06/2008
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he executed numerous trades in the account of a client without her approval.

24272 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Diligence; Misrepresentation; Fitness; Record-Keeping; Professional Discipline; Revocation of Other Professional License; Settlement
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); Article 3(e); 102; Article 3(d); 201; Article 3(a); 607; 701; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 03/25/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he she improperly notarized a power of attorney and had her notary license revoked as a result.

30507 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Delay---Petition; Petition-for-Consideration---Denied
Keyword(s): Petition-for-Consideration; Unauthorized-use-of-CFP-Marks; Fraud-Other; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Fitness-Standards
Matter Type(s): Unauthorized-use-of-CFP-Marks; Civil Suit; Customer-Complaints
Decision Date: 06/12/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® applicant (“Respondent”) failed to meet CFP Board’s Fitness Standards when: (1) She misrepresented the cost of various insurance policies, and engaged in misleading sales tactics to convince clients to purchase insurance plans; and (2) her firm used CFP® marks on the Respondent’s firm profile page before Respondent was certified.


Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total