Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
21409 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Dismiss--w/Caution
Keyword(s): Disclosure to Clients; Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Record-Keeping; Misuse of the Marks
Matter Type(s): Civil Court
Decision Date: 03/27/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he was the subject of a civil suit by a client (“Claimant”) for recommendations he had made to Claimant regarding the purchase of a life insurance policy.

22243 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Dismiss--w/Caution
Keyword(s): Other Ethics
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/27/2009
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he did not follow the instructions of his client (“Grievant”) to liquidate all of Grievant’s investments.

26498 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Dismiss--w/Caution
Keyword(s): Suitability; Diligence
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 08/21/2012
Summary: Whether aCFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) maintained that an investment (“Fund”) was still appropriate for the client and that the client would be “fine in a year,” while knowing Fund had declined significantly and the risk had unofficially changed; 2) did not recommend his client sell Fund when he learned from that Fund was riskier than he originally thought; and 3) violated employer policy and when he misrepresented Fund to his client, resulting in a cautionary letter from his broker-dealer.

30621 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Dismiss--w/Caution
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Record-Keeping; Professional Discipline; Disclosure to Clients; Books and Records
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 10/25/2017
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she violated the State administrative code by: a) excluding the formula used to calculate the advisory fee on its invoices; b) failing to concurrently send invoices at the time the advisory fee was deducted; c) taking action to withdraw funds when failing to comply with safekeeping requirements; d) failing to maintain net capital of at least $25,000; e) failing to notify the State within 24 hours of its deficient net capital and to suspend business operations during the time of the net capital deficiency; f) failing to amend multiple items on its Form ADV; and g) failing to file timely financial statements.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total