Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
30866 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Failure to Repay Loan to Firm; Bankruptcy; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; Arbitration; Bankruptcies
Decision Date: 10/01/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he was terminated by his employer for inappropriate behavior that was harmful or embarrassing to the firm or its clients.


30782 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Unauthorized Transaction; Felony-Non-Violent Crime
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); Article 3(d); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Employer Action; Criminal; Criminal Court
Decision Date: 02/01/2018
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: (1) performed 40 unauthorized trades in a deceased person’s account; (2) failed to notify his firm of the death of two advisory clients, in violation of firm policy; and (3) accidentally brought a loaded firearm into an international airport and, thereafter, pled guilty to felony charges. 

29948 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 6.2; Article 3(e)
Matter Type(s): Criminal; Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 07/22/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when (a) he copied drivers licenses of “extraordinary persons” in violation of State law, (b) State criminally convicted him of a misdemeanor, which resulted in a felony charge from State, (c) he failed to promptly disclose to Firm 1 that he had been charged with a felony, (d) he failed to amend his Form U4, in violation of Financial Industry Regulatory Industry, Inc. (“FINRA” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealers or “NASD”) Rule 2010 and NASD Rule 3070(b), (e) the State Securities Division concluded that Respondent was not of “good business repute” and denied Respondent’s State securities salesperson license and investment adviser representative license applications, (f) Firm 1 terminated Respondent’s employment because of his criminal indictment, and (g) Firm 2 terminated Respondent’s employment due to the State Securities Division’s Order of Denial.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total