Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
29473 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Denied Petition
Keyword(s): Professional Discipline; Unauthorized Use of the Marks; Outside Business Activity; Judgment Lien; Unauthorized Transaction; Employer Policy Violation
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline; FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 08/05/2016
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification could be certified when he: 1) invested personal in an outside investment without obtaining prior approval from his firm; 2) referred former clients to, and facilitated investments in, the same outside investment; 3) wilfully failed to amend his Form U4 to report three unsatisfied tax liens; 4) falsely certified to his firm on several occasions that he had complied with his obligation to timely update his Form U4 regarding unsatisfied tax liens; 5) consented to a one-year suspension by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealers or “NASD”) due to the aforementioned conduct; and 6) used the CFP® marks when he was not authorized to do so.

29910 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Unauthorized Transaction
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.3; 5.1
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 11/02/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) exercised discretion in executing six transactions in six different customer accounts without obtaining written authorization from his clients to exercise discretion in their accounts; and 2) failed to cooperate with his firm’s review of the unauthorized activity.

30147 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Granted Petition
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Unauthorized Transaction
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 08/05/2016
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification could be certified when he: 1) executed securities transactions on behalf of a customer without authority to do so; 2) submitted a document to his firm that was false and misleading regarding whether the securities transactions were authorized; and 3) made oral statements to the state regulators that were materially false.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total