Page 1 of 1 , 5 Items in Total
23337 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Other Ethics; Fitness; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 101(b); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 01/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he used copyrighted materials without permission or attribution.

29246 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fiduciary Duty; Misrepresentation; Commission/Compensation; Conflict of Interest; Professional Discipline; Suitability; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.5; 2.1; 2.2(a); 2.2(b); 4.3; 1.4; Article 3(d)
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 10/01/2018
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct by making material misstatements and omissions to their clients while recommending that the clients invest in what was found to be a Ponzi-like investment scheme.


29005 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Fiduciary Duty; Suitability; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.6; 102; 1.4; 201; 5.1; 406; 606(b); 4.1; 4.4; 401(a); 606(a); 6.5; 2.2(a); 4.3
Matter Type(s): Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 11/20/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she sold “C” shares to her clients not because they were suitable, but as a method of ensuring that she was paid for her advisory services, and failed to: 1) enter into written advisory agreements with her “C” share advisory clients; 2) provide written disclosures required by Part 2 of Form ADV to her “C” share advisory clients; and 3) provide a complete description of the share class options and fees of mutual funds to her “C” share advisory clients and failed to: 1) ensure that salespersons were making suitable “C” share investment recommendations; 2) enforce the RIA Manual requirement of a written advisory agreement for clients using “C” shares as an advisory fee; and 3) enforce the requirement of delivery of the Disclosure Document. Respondent also failed to reasonably supervise her salespersons by failing to ensure that salespersons were making suitable “C” share investment recommendations. Respondent also failed to report her suspension by State from acting in any principal or supervisory capacity for twelve months to CFP Board within 30 calendar days, in violation of Article 13.2 of the Disciplinary Rules and Procedures (“Disciplinary Rules”).

29347 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline; Fiduciary Duty; Customer Complaints
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; 2.2(a); 1.4; 4.3; Article 3(b); Article 3(a); 5.1; 4.4; 2.1; 2.2(e)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 04/26/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he directed his clients to sign, but not date, numerous incomplete and blank forms, including account registration forms, transfer forms, and annuity application forms, which did not include written disclosure of information such as fees, sales charges, or surrender charges.

30033 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Disclosure to Clients; Fee-Only; Securities Laws Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 4.3; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 07/21/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) communicated, directly or indirectly, to clients or prospective clients misleading information directly or indirectly related to the certificant’s professional qualifications or services when he misrepresented his compensation structure as “fee-only” despite receiving commissions; 2) failed to disclose to prospective clients or clients an accurate and understandable description of the compensation arrangements being offered; 3) failed to separately invoice clients each time he withdrew his fee from the client’s account causing him to violate net-capital requirements; and 4) entered into, extended, or renewed investment advisory contracts which failed to disclose accurate advisory fees.

Page 1 of 1 , 5 Items in Total