Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
30047 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Revocation
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fiduciary Duty; civil-judgements; Customer Complaints; Judgment Lien
Standard(s) Violated: Article 1.4; 4.1; 4.3; 4.5; 400-2; 500-2; Article-13.2; Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): Customer Complaint; Other Professional Discipline; Liens and judgments
Decision Date: 04/01/2019
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he was permanently barred by a state securities commissioner for 1) unreasonable fees and Breach of Fiduciary Duty for collecting a management fee of $39,727.95 while client accounts earned $332.46 money market interest, 2) failing to maintain a positive net worth at all times and failing to disclose it, and 3) failing to disclose two civil judgments and two customer complaints.


30434 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline; Misrepresentation; Fiduciary Duty; Suitability
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); Article 3(a); 4.3; 2.1; 1.4
Matter Type(s): Customer Complaint; Other Professional Discipline
Decision Date: 07/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to act with the duty of care of a fiduciary when he charged clients an unreasonable investment advisory fee in violation of State law; and 2) failed to disclose the risks involved with Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REIT”) and non-traded REITs in his Form ADV Part 2 in violation of State law.


30628 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Failure to Respond to CFP Board; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Diligence; Suitability; Fiduciary Duty; Client's Best Interest
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.5; Article 3(b); Article 3(f); 701; 400-3; 4.4; 300-1; 202; 2.1; 1.4
Matter Type(s): Customer Complaint; Complaint to CFP Board
Decision Date: 02/01/2019
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he repeatedly and over the course of time failed to act in the interest of his client because he: (a) did not provide the client with the financial planning services outlined in the Financial Planning Agreement; (b) failed to schedule annual portfolio reviews with a client to consider whether her current holdings matched her current priorities; and (c) failed to update the client’s portfolio based upon her changed circumstances after she lost her job, became ill, and grew increasingly closer to retirement.


Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total