Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
22961 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Misrepresentation; Fitness; Forgery
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(b); 406; 607; 201; Article 3(a); 102
Matter Type(s): Professionalism; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 03/23/2010
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he signed his clients’ initials to account-related documents and represented to his employer that the initials were made by the clients.

23337 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Other Ethics; Fitness; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 102; 101(b); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 01/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® certificant (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he used copyrighted materials without permission or attribution.

24651 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Forgery; Professional Discipline; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 406; 606(b); 102; 607; 606(a)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 08/06/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he affixed multiple client signatures on documents and purchased financial plans for two clients with his own funds in violation of firm policy, National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD,” now Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or “FINRA”) Conduct Rule 2110, and a state insurance code provision.

26886 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Suspension
Keyword(s): Court Order Violation; Misrepresentation; Employer Policy Violation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 606(b); 602; 102; 201; 607
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/20/2012
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) sent anonymous letters to former clients falsely identifying himself as a former Compliance Officer with a broker-dealer; 2) denied, under oath, any involvement in writing the anonymous letters during his deposition testimony, but later admitted that he answered falsely under oath and knew the answers were false when he provided the original testimony; and 3) violated the terms of a preliminary injunction prohibiting him from contacting former clients, resulting in a Contempt of Court Order, three-day jail term and $500 fine.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total