Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total
26931 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Forgery; Judgment Lien; Customer Complaints
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 201; 607; 4.3; 4.4
Decision Date: 04/11/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she: 1) assisted a client with obtaining restitution from an insurance company after taking two withdrawals in an Annuity contract year with the knowledge that it would reduce the guaranteed withdrawal benefits of the Annuity; and 2) altered dates on a client document.

28508 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Client's Best Interest; Supervision; Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Professionalism; Suitability
Standard(s) Violated: Article 201; 407(a); 705; 401(a); 703; 202; 607
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 05/14/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) recommended the Biotech Company stock to Client without giving the client the prospectuses or PPMs for the penny stock investments: 2) sold the Biotech Company stock to Client without the knowledge or approval of Firm; 3) discouraged the Clients from selling the penny stocks, while he sold his own Biotech Company shares; 4) recommended to Client the loan to Biotech Company, a company in which he had a personal stake, without disclosing the inherent conflict of interest; and 5) personally reimbursed Client $30,000 as compensation for a loan recommendation he made to Client.

28739 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Suitability
Standard(s) Violated: Article 607; 703; 701; 201; 202; 705
Matter Type(s): FINRA Arbitration
Decision Date: 12/04/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he sold the client unsuitable variable annuities, recommended the client mortgage her home to invest the proceeds and sold the client a LTC insurance policy that did not meet her needs.

29573 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fraud Related to Professional Activity; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.3; 102; 606(a); 2.1; 607; 6.5
Matter Type(s): Arbitration; Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 11/06/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he held himself out to the public as a licensed Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) while he was not licensed as a CPA.

Page 1 of 1 , 4 Items in Total