Page 1 of 1 , 17 Items in Total
27092 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Securities Laws Violation; Commission/Compensation; Advertising; Employer Policy Violation; Misuse of the Marks; Client's Best Interest; Misrepresentation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; 2.1; 4.5; 6.1; Article 3(a); 6.5; 1.4; 4.3; 5.1; 4.4
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 08/09/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he 1) sold allegedly unsuitable insurance policies to his financial planning clients; 2) communicated to clients and prospective clients allegedly misleading information related to client testimonials, the registration status of his firm (“Respondent’s Firm”), and his compensation; 3) was terminated by Firm due to his use of client testimonials, failure to disclose outside business activities, and advertising violations; 4) violated State securities laws related to registration of his business entities, disclosure of outside business activities, client testimonials, and disclosure of his criminal charge to all regulatory bodies; 5) pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of Obtaining Contents of Communications; and 6) improperly used the CFP® marks in the Internet domain name www.respondentsnamecfp.com, the email addresses respondent@respondentsnamecfp.com and employee@respondentsnamecfp.com, and the Twitter handle @respondentsnameCFP and the corresponding Internet domain name https://twitter.com/#!/respondentsnamecfp.

28197 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 04/18/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she represented her compensation structure as “fee-only” on a public search engine.

28263 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 05/09/2013
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she represented on her firm website that there were no conflicts of interest associated with her commission-based advice.

28972 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 6.5; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 07/31/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he misrepresented his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search tool.

29019 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 11/20/2014
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct (“Standards”) when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29043 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): Professionalism
Decision Date: 04/29/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she disclosed her compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function despite her employment with Bank, which is affiliated with a broker-dealer.

29220 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation; Disclosure to Clients
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.1; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 06/26/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he publicly represented his compensation method as “fee only” on the “Find” search tool while registered with a broker-dealer that earns commissions for selling securities and while he still receives commissions for securities and insurance products that he previously sold.

29234 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/13/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while serving as a registered representative of a broker-dealer.

29262 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29269 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 05/08/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29271 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 2.1; 2.2(a)
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct (“Standards”) when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while registered as a registered representative with Broker-Dealer, a related party of Respondent that receives, or is entitled to receive commissions, and while he is entitled to receive referral fees if he refers clients to other affiliated of his employer.

29275 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he inaccurately disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function.

29287 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation; Fee-Only
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 6.5; 2.1
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 07/31/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he, disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while receiving commissions from insurance sales.

29300 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Fee-Only; Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.2(a); 2.1; 6.5
Matter Type(s): CFP Board
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct (“Standards”) when he disclosed his compensation structure as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search function while he: 1) was entitled to receive commissions as a registered representative and due to being licensed and appointed to sell insurance; and 2) he earned a salary and bonus that is affected by referrals he makes to related parties that receive non-fee compensation.

30258 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1
Matter Type(s): Other
Decision Date: 02/28/2017
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he twice represented his compensation method as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® Professional” search tool while he had two related partiers that were entitled to receive commissions.

30279 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 2.1
Matter Type(s): Other
Decision Date: 03/02/2017
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when she misrepresented her compensation method as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® professional” search tool due to the following: a) Respondent is licensed and appointed to sell insurance which entitles her to receive commissions; and b) Respondent’s related party, her employer ABC, receives or is entitled to receive commissions through divisions that sell mortgages, securities, and insurance.

30289 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Commission/Compensation
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 2.1
Decision Date: 07/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he communicated misleading information to clients or prospective clients when he misrepresented his compensation method as “fee-only” on CFP Board’s “Find a CFP® professional” search tool due to the following: a) licensed registered representatives affiliated with Firm’s brokerage department, a related party, are entitled to receive commissions for selling securities and insurance products to Firm’s clients; b) mortgage loan originators in Firm’s Mortgage Loan Department, a related party, are entitled to receive commissions for arranging mortgage loans for Firm’s clients; and c) employees of Firm receive referral fees for introducing prospective clients to Firm’s brokerage department.


Page 1 of 1 , 17 Items in Total