Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total
16726 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Lawsuits Involving Financial Matters; Disclosure to CFP Board; Misrepresentation; Professional Discipline; Arbitration
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 607; Article 3(g)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 11/30/2009
Summary: Whether a candidate for CFP® certification (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) Made exaggerated statements and improper projections about clients’ accounts; 2) Prepared and/or used documents that had not been approved by a registered principal of Respondent’s firm; 3) Failed to retain records showing which sales materials were disseminated to customers; and 4) Failed to disclose a 2003 civil suit and a 2003 National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) arbitration on the Declaration Section of his Initial Application for CFP® Certification.

19834 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Misrepresentation; Professionalism; Professional Discipline; Diligence; Fraud Related to Professional Activity
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 606(b); 406; 102; Article 3(a); 201; 607; 701
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 07/23/2010
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he obtained waivers of Contingent Deferred Sales Charges (“CDSCs”) for approximately 14 customers by claiming that these customers were disabled, when, in fact, they were not.

25939 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Outside Business Activity; Professionalism; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.4; Article 3(d); 607; 606(b); 406; 606(a); 407(a); Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 10/20/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to disclose outside business activities to his employer.

25940 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Disclosure to CFP Board; Professionalism; Professional Discipline; Supervision
Standard(s) Violated: Article 606(a); 607; Article 3(a); Article 3(e); 201; Article 3(d); 606(b); 701
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 10/17/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to ensure that a registered representative under his supervision disclosed his participation in a Stock to Cash program after learning that the representative had ignored his prior instruction to make such disclosure; 2) failed to supervise a registered representative’s performance of the representative’s suitability and due diligence obligations when recommending Stock to Cash to customers; and 3) violated NASD Conduct Rules 3010 and 2110 and was suspended by FINRA from acting in a principal capacity for 15 business days.

29973 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Compensation; Books and Records
Standard(s) Violated: Article 4.1; Article-4; Article 3(d); 5.1; Article-13.4; Article-13.1; 4.3; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline; CFP Board
Decision Date: 02/01/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he shared commissions with two unregistered individuals and caused his firm’s books and records to be inaccurate. 


29350 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Private Censure
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Suitability; Client's Best Interest; Securities Laws Violation; Professional Discipline
Standard(s) Violated: Article 2.1; 4.1; 6.5; 4.5; 4.6; 4.3; 4.4
Matter Type(s): FINRA Discipline
Decision Date: 04/10/2015
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) failed to disclose information related to the liquidity of, risks associated with, and the assets underlying an investment product; 2) failed to make and preserve books and records as required under the Exchange Act rules by having a record of basic identifying and financial information for the two clients involved in purchasing an investment; 3) allowed an unregistered employee to effect the purchase of an investment; and 4) failed to enforce his firm’s written supervisory procedures by failing to prepare new account forms and record basic identifying and financial information for the clients’ who purchased an investment.

Page 1 of 1 , 6 Items in Total