Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total
30450 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Books and Records; Conflict of Interest; Disclosure to Clients; Client's Best Interest
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(d); 4.4; 4.3; 2.2(b); 1.4; Article 3(a)
Matter Type(s): Regulatory Action; CFP Board
Decision Date: 10/02/2017
Summary:

Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he failed to: (a) seek best execution for clients when investing them in share classes that charged 12b-1 fees despite the availability of corresponding share classes without the fees; (b) disclose in his firm’s Forms ADV and advisory agreements the conflicts of interest that existed regarding his recommendations to clients of mutual funds that contained 12b-1 fees; and (c) perform required annual compliance reviews.


24933 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Disclosure to Clients; Fitness; Customer Complaints; Unauthorized Transaction; Professionalism; Diligence
Standard(s) Violated: Article Article 3(a); 4.4; 6.5; 2.2(b)
Matter Type(s): Client Dissatisfaction
Decision Date: 06/21/2011
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when he: 1) made unauthorized trades by liquidating a deceased client’s trust account causing the trust to incur commissions; 2) was unaware that the bank trustee could have contacted the broker-dealer directly to avoid transaction costs; and 3) agreed to accept $200,000 as a beneficiary of the client’s trust account, while maintaining his role advisor to the trust.

29948 – Anonymous Case History
Decision: Letter of Admonition
Keyword(s): Employer Policy Violation; Professional Discipline; Securities Laws Violation; Failure to Notify CFP Board
Standard(s) Violated: Article 6.5; 6.2; Article 3(e)
Matter Type(s): Criminal; Regulatory Action
Decision Date: 07/22/2016
Summary: Whether a CFP® professional (“Respondent”) violated CFP Board’s Standards of Professional Conduct when (a) he copied drivers licenses of “extraordinary persons” in violation of State law, (b) State criminally convicted him of a misdemeanor, which resulted in a felony charge from State, (c) he failed to promptly disclose to Firm 1 that he had been charged with a felony, (d) he failed to amend his Form U4, in violation of Financial Industry Regulatory Industry, Inc. (“FINRA” formerly known as the National Association of Securities Dealers or “NASD”) Rule 2010 and NASD Rule 3070(b), (e) the State Securities Division concluded that Respondent was not of “good business repute” and denied Respondent’s State securities salesperson license and investment adviser representative license applications, (f) Firm 1 terminated Respondent’s employment because of his criminal indictment, and (g) Firm 2 terminated Respondent’s employment due to the State Securities Division’s Order of Denial.

Page 1 of 1 , 3 Items in Total